RE: FW: Original Tire height

["John F Sandhoff" <sandhoff@csus.edu>]

Gordon writes:
> My calculations were based on an aspect ratio of 82%, which might
> not be correct.

I HAVE a 5.60x14 on the rim. I know its circumference is at least 3
inches larger than the calculated 73.1 (5280 ft/mile * 12 in/ft / 866 rev/mi).

Maybe R&T was running their tests using flat tires :-)

-- John
     John F Sandhoff   sandhoff@csus.edu   Sacramento, CA

///
///  datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
///