That does not seem like a lot of mileage for this day and age. I had a 1964
TR4 Triumph. It had a two speed Rear axle. It was a four speed, and there
was a lever on the Steering column that would change the ratio in every gear
as you were driving. From low to high, or high to low. I was a much
younger man at that time, and was not into gear ratios, but I wonder what
that set up was all about. Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas - Sweden <csp311@telia.com>
To: Datsun Roadster List <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Date: Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: FJ20 conversion? I didn't mean to start anything
>It's 22.8 mpg
>
>Patrick P. Castronovo wrote:
>
>> First we must deal with the FJ20 Conversion, then we now have to deal
with
>> the Liter/kms. Like us Americans know what you are talking about. Maybe
>> it's just me, never learned the conversion tables. Pat
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adam Fox <adfox@iprimus.com.au>
>> To: Datsun Roadster List <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
>> Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: FJ20 conversion? I didn't mean to start anything
>>
>> >It has to be said that the FJ20 is one of the toughest looking four
>> cylinder
>> >engines around.
>> >Also, someone mentioned fuel economy as being a potential problem, ive
>> >found that I can get better than 10L/100kms on the highway from mine,
which
>> >is not too bad really. The SR should do somewhat better than that. When
>> you
>> >boot it it tends to go thru a bit of juice tho. But you cant make power
>> >without fuel.
>> >
>> >Adam
>
>
>
>--
><><><><><><><><><><><>
> Thomas in Sweden
> Nissan Silvia #319
> Nissan Silvia #293
|