What I can say is that here in Europe H20 was not only used on
forklifts but also on a light truck called Urvan E23.
Pistons are different, H20 are hollow -stock U20 are flat (BTW still
in stock over here).
Crank bushings and seals are the same as I used them to rebuild my
U20.
If you crank is very worn out then go for H20 forklift, more choice of
thicknesses.
For the rest:
If someone has tech. data about the stock U20 crankshaft, Ill be able
to compare it to the stock Urvan H20.
Chris-The Belgian Roadster
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=1424148&Auth=false
-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: "Tony Genovese" <chaztg@hotmail.com>
An: <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Mdrz 2001 16:45
Betreff: H 20 vs. U 20 bottom end
> Hi Guys,
> since I've never seen one (H-20 crank), I was wondering if anyone
can
> confirm my suspiscions regarding the H20 and U20 crank differences.
> Is the main difference (besides the mods that have to be done to the
U
> crankshaft to make it work in an R motor) being that the U series
crank is
> fully counterweighted, whereas the H series crank is not?
> Is this a noticeable performance defecit if one uses the H series
crank in a
> street motor?
>
> Tony Genovese
> _________________________________________________________________
|