This comes down to authenticity vs. expression. My feeling is - If you want to
customize/personalize your Roadster, Go for it! I would dispute the
"authenticity" of
teardrop side markers on any but RHD models outside of the '69 model year,
though. If you
want to remain in the Stock class in the car shows, you'll have to convert to
RHD ;^).
Tony Genovese wrote:
> I too think that the teardrop markers are very nice looking. I think that
> putting them on our non-Japanese market roadsters should be "allowed" if
> they were indeed present on the home market cars.
>
> My friend wanted to put them on his 240Z in substituion of the--how should I
> say. . .less than pretty-- rectangular ones (sorry, no offense intended to
> my fellow 1970 Roadster owners) As you probably know, 240Z sports cars had
> the same rectangular side markers on all four corners. I took the liberty to
> remove the rear red ones on my 240 (like home market cars).
> I've also noticed that my 67.5 wiring diagram for my roadster has the side
> markers included--anyone else see that?
> Tony Genovese
> _________________________________________________________________
|