Taro,
The magazine is from England what do you expect?????? There's too much to
fix on British cars and it takes years. I used to get that mag several years
ago when I dwelled in Manhattan which had all these great magazine stores.
Still a good magazine and many good general articles.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: Taro Kusunose <tkusunose@hotmail.com>
To: <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 12:29 PM
Subject: Roadster (not) in the press
> I'm glad to see the Roadster getting its much deserved coverage up in
> Canada. Last weekend I picked up an imported British magazine by the name
> of Practical Classics. It was the first time I had seen it, but based on
> what was on the cover (magazine touting to cover "practical" classics, not
> the "exotic" classics; stories on MGs, Triumphs, Austins, old Hondas,
> Z-cars, amateur restorations, etc.), I was sure that my $7.75 was well
spent
> and that I would find some Roadster references in it. The magazine is
> EXCELLENT in all aspects but one; it does not acknowledge the Roadster's
> existence!! No reference anywhere in the mag (ads, articles, etc.). Even
> their pricing guide for "1000 practical classics" fails to list the
> Roadster, even though it lists every other conceivably comparable car.
> Sheesh. Maybe it was a bum issue. Maybe the Roadster is now considered
an
> EXOTIC!!
>
> Taro
> Seattle, WA
>
>
> >From: "sidney raper" <spl310@hotmail.com>
> >Reply-To: "sidney raper" <spl310@hotmail.com>
> >To: datsunroadsters@egroups.com, datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> >Subject: Roadster in the press
> >Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:49:40 EDT
> >
> >Hey,
> >
> >Does anyone know this guy?
> >
> >http://www.ottawacitizen.com/wheels/autobiography/991008/2967296.html
> >
> >Sid
> >_________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
>
|