Probably needs more clarification. Maybe their intent was a discussion of
the 67.5 1600's, which have a body identical to the 67.5 2000's except for
cosmetics (grille, chrome, shifter plate and badging).
So, is that the case? Personally, I think the '66's and '67's are special.
The dash treatment is sooo much nicer than the '67.5's. I know, the '67.5's
have other features like visors and dual brake masters. But I really like
the earlier dash treatment.
Fred - So.SF
'66 with 2L (so I'm a tiny little bit biased)
'68 2000
'68 1600
'70 1600
_________________________ Reply Separator ______________________________
> Subject: Re: '67 1600s
> Author: michael e landskroner <datsunmike@juno.com>
> Date: 5/23/2000 7:11 PM
>
> While I don't mean to degrade any Roadster, I don't see what's so special
> about a '67 as it is exactly like a '66, like mine for example.
>
> I've had 1819 for 20 years and it has under-gone 2 complete restos in
> the 20 years. It has the original engine and tranny (not for long) but
> numerous other parts were modified to make it more reliable for driving
> eg: 240Z alternator, electric fan, more comfortable seats that don't
> fly forward when you stop short and other improvements.
>
> My $.02
|