datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sports Car of the Millenium

To: "Dennis Desmond" <lilden@worldnet.att.net>,
Subject: Re: Sports Car of the Millenium
From: "PATRICK P. CASTRONOVO" <slick@mohaveaz.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:17:44 -0700
The year 2000, datsun 1600.  Somehow I do not see the message here.  Now I
can understand datsun 2000, the year 2000.  It fits like it was meant to be.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Desmond <lilden@worldnet.att.net>
To: PATRICK P. CASTRONOVO <slick@mohaveaz.com>; Bob Dicke
<rtdengr@chorus.net>; Datsun-Roadsters (E-mail)
<datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Date: Saturday, August 21, 1999 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: Sports Car of the Millenium


>since it is doubtful i will be around for the next time, how would it be
>with you if we make the 1600 " the car of the renaissance " ?
>dennis
>brooklyn
>1969 1600
>
>----------
>> From: PATRICK P. CASTRONOVO <slick@mohaveaz.com>
>> To: Dennis Desmond <lilden@worldnet.att.net>; Bob Dicke
><rtdengr@chorus.net>; Datsun-Roadsters (E-mail)
><datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
>> Subject: Re: Sports Car of the Millenium
>> Date: Saturday, August 21, 1999 6:12 AM
>>
>> You will have to wait till the year 1600 comes around again.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dennis Desmond <lilden@worldnet.att.net>
>> To: Bob Dicke <rtdengr@chorus.net>; Datsun-Roadsters (E-mail)
>> <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
>> Date: Saturday, August 21, 1999 10:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: Sports Car of the Millenium
>>
>>
>> >hey man, what about the 1600 ?
>> >dennis
>> >brooklyn
>> >1969 1600
>> >
>> >----------
>> >> From: Bob Dicke <rtdengr@chorus.net>
>> >> To: Datsun-Roadsters (E-mail) <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
>> >> Subject: Sports Car of the Millenium
>> >> Date: Friday, August 20, 1999 8:28 PM
>> >>
>> >> There was a lot of talk recently about the general public's lack of
>> >> appreciation for Datsun Roadsters as sports cars.  Well, I propose
>that
>> >we
>> >> simply declare the two liter Datsun Roadster the "Sports Car of the
>> >> Millenium."   Why not?
>> >>
>> >> 1. It has "2000" in its name
>> >> 2. It is guaranteed to be Y2K compliant
>> >> 3. It is fun to drive
>> >>
>> >> What else do you need?
>> >>
>> >> Bob Dicke
>> >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>