datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FW: Questions about restoration, and are 1600's the Red headed

To: Robert.Long@CSDInc.com
Subject: Re: FW: Questions about restoration, and are 1600's the Red headed
From: Gary McCormick <svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:19:06 -0700
The only thing wrong with the R16 Fighter Squadron concept (in relation to U20 
Bombers) is
– aren't fighters supposed to be faster than bombers? ;^ )

(Sorry guys, I just couldn't resist.)

Gary McCormick
San Jose, CA
-------------------------------------

Robert.Long@CSDInc.com wrote:

> I gotta agree with Gary, but I sure would like an R16 "Fighter" Squadron
> shirt to rival those U20 "Bomber" shirts...
>
> Robert Long - 67.5 1600 - Albuquerque Fighter Wing
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary McCormick [mailto:svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 1999 2:10 PM
> To: Datsun-Roadsters (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Questions about restoration, and are 1600's the Red headed
> Step-children?
>
> Sounds like a  Secessionist movement to me. Didn't we slap one of those down
> back in
> (18)63 or so? ;^ )
>
> "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
>           Benjamin Franklin, at the signing of the Declaration of
> Independence, July 4,
> 1776
>
> Gary McCormick
> San Jose, CA
> -----------------------------------
>
> eric gilbert wrote:
>
> > i would be willing to start a 1600 sub list or club.
> >
> > i'm tired of reading the 2000 stuff.  timing chain problems, etc.
> >
> > do you want to take the ball?
> >
> > i'll design something.
> >
> > and i'm not chopping the machine either.  better original.
> >
> > eric
> > 67 1600


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>