In a message dated 06/22/1999 11:12:46 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
jt_milton@yahoo.com writes:
<< Hi Taylor,
Have you considered getting a 1600 instead. Same car just less power
than the 2000 and more within your price range.
joshua milton
69 1600
encino, ca
--- BRITT TAYLOR COLLINS <panza@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hello, my name is Taylor. I am 16 and have next to
> nothing when it
> comes to money. I am looking for a 2000 that I
> could restore but all I
> have to offer is $500. I someone could help me out
> and find something
> for me, I would be immensely grateful. I live in
> Atlanta Georgia and
> would be willing to drive to some of my neighboring
> states if
> necessary. Thanks alot, taylor
> >>
Taylor,
I would agree that you should also look at 1600's. The rebuild cost of the
engines in the 1600's is a lot less than in the 2000, as well as the cars
being generally less expensive to buy.
We all wish you luck and hope you find a car.
Joseph Berkenbile
70 1600
Albuquerque
|