british-cars
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MPG

To: "bellcore!EDDIE.MIT.EDU!alliant!british-cars"@bellcore.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: MPG
From: mit-eddie!bellcore.bellcore.com!taichi!whs70@EDDIE.MIT.EDU
Date: 25 Apr 1990 8:04 EDT
Ed Devinney writes:
>Someone (I can't decipher the header) writes:
>
>Speaking of octane, has anyone had experience with mixing leaded
>regular and unleaded premium? The theory is that the result should have
>higher octane than the unleaded rating.
>--- end citation
>
>Additionally, I remember reading a year or so ago that the reduced lead
>available in current leaded gas was insufficient to allow the octane 'pushing'
>effect that mixing might have.
>
Ed is correct.  With 'leaded' regular now containing less than 1/10 gram of 
lead per gallon, the mixing of leaded regular (nominally around 89 octane)
and unleaded premium (92 to 94 octane) will no longer result in a higher
octane rating than that of the unleaded premium.

Bill Sohl


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • MPG, sgi!chromavac.csd.sgi.com!miq
    • Re: MPG, mit-eddie!wsl.dec.com!kent
    • Re: MPG, sgi!chromavac.csd.sgi.com!miq
    • Re: MPG, mit-eddie!iris.brown.edu!ejd
    • Re: MPG, mit-eddie!bellcore.bellcore.com!taichi!whs70 <=
    • Re: MPG, mit-eddie!hp6600.desk.hp.com!larry_schwarcz%q0
    • MPG, Robert D. Houk
    • Re: MPG, mit-eddie!wsl.dec.com!kent
    • Re: MPG, oneway@athena.mit.edu
    • Re: MPG, Ralph E. Droms
    • Re: MPG, Randell Jesup
    • Re: MPG, Roger Garnett
    • Re: MPG, mit-eddie!bellcore.bellcore.com!taichi!whs70
    • Re: MPG, Keptin Komrade Dr. Bobwrench III
    • Re: MPG, Philip J Ethier