To: | "bellcore!EDDIE.MIT.EDU!alliant!british-cars"@bellcore.bellcore.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: MPG |
From: | mit-eddie!bellcore.bellcore.com!taichi!whs70@EDDIE.MIT.EDU |
Date: | 25 Apr 1990 8:04 EDT |
Ed Devinney writes: >Someone (I can't decipher the header) writes: > >Speaking of octane, has anyone had experience with mixing leaded >regular and unleaded premium? The theory is that the result should have >higher octane than the unleaded rating. >--- end citation > >Additionally, I remember reading a year or so ago that the reduced lead >available in current leaded gas was insufficient to allow the octane 'pushing' >effect that mixing might have. > Ed is correct. With 'leaded' regular now containing less than 1/10 gram of lead per gallon, the mixing of leaded regular (nominally around 89 octane) and unleaded premium (92 to 94 octane) will no longer result in a higher octane rating than that of the unleaded premium. Bill Sohl |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | re:TVR trivia, Mike Tobin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Wrenching Party(ies) Saturday, Larry Colen esq |
Previous by Thread: | Re: MPG, mit-eddie!iris.brown.edu!ejd |
Next by Thread: | Re: MPG, mit-eddie!hp6600.desk.hp.com!larry_schwarcz%q0 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |