Scott Fisher writes about the wet HydroLastic suspension:
>I have never had a satisfactory answer about why the HydroLastic
>suspension isn't in wider use today.
I do remember seeing, in either an old AutoWeek or Road&Track, an artcile
(oops - article) about an engineer working on active-type suspensions who had
built a late-model Camaro as a test bed. This car was, as I recall, suspended
on hydraulic cylinders cross-linked RF-LR/LF-RR.
Maybe not exactly the same, but was this system a relative of the wet Mini
suspension? Anybody recall?
ed
|