bricklin
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Carburetor

To: "Bricklin" <bricklin@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Carburetor
From: "Greg" <wingracer@email.msn.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:58:01 -0500
Hmm, my previous response doesn't factor in an aftermarket exhaust. With a
free flow exhaust, I'd increase the cfm to 650, which IIRC has the same
1-3/8" primaries as the 500cfm 2bbl.

Yes, torque spins tires, but since B's don't hook up well, not sure I'd want
much, if any, more. According to a C&D road test, the stocker's peak torque
is 285ftlbs/2200rpm.

Fuel flow (gal/hr) = (cfm*4.38*F/A)/6

where:

F/A = fuel/air ratio, i.e. 12.8:1 = 1/12.8 = 0.078

So for 500cfm/12.8:1 = 28.47gal/hr, 600cfm = 34.16, 650cfm = 37.01, 750cfm =
42.7.

Of course this assumes WOT for an hour, but it still tells the relative
difference in fuel economy if you get into the secondaries very often, so if
it gets 16mpg/500cfm, expect ~13.3mpg/600cfm, ~12.3mpg/650cfm, and
~10.7mpg/750cfm. Otherwise, the difference will be somewhat less as there's
not a big difference in the size of the various spreadbore's primaries in
these cfm's IIRC (can't find my spec shts).

Back when the first gas 'shortage' occurred, we disabled the secondaries of
our 'vettes, musclecars, etc., and as long as we didn't floor them or run
them over ~65mph, we never missed them and increased mileage ~33% IIRC.

GM

----- Original Message -----

> Thanks for all the info so far.  This is great stuff and I'm having alot
of
> fun with it.  I ran some numbers through my software and this is what I
came
> up with.
>
> I'll speak in terms of  torque since that is what makes the tires spin,
yes?
> These figures are on our cars with a stock 351W, no mods other than the
carb,
> exhaust and manifold.
> Also a 5000 rpm redline.
>
> RPM         500cfm            600cfm               750cfm  carburetor
> 2500            285                  291                   294
> 2750            293                  300                   304
> 3000            297                  303                   308   peak
> 3250            297                  303                   308   same
> 3500            289                  296                   302
> 3750            275                  284                   290
> 4000            257                  267                   275
> 4250            230                  243                   252
> 4500            203                  216                   225
> The off the line difference I can not determine but I would bet that all
> three senarios will be very close in the quarter.  Question is, what is
the
> fuel savings between the 500 and 750 cfm?
>
> Greg Arend
> Advantage Air
> Flagstaff  AZ

///
///  bricklin@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>