No, it was actually orange, I have pictures of it before it was painted,
I'll try to get them scanned, I'm just gessing it was a facory error.
Ryan #2568
Rodgers
>From: "John T. Blair" <jblair@exis.net>
>Reply-To: "John T. Blair" <jblair@exis.net>
>To: bricklin@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: Vin numbers
>Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:52:47 -0500
>
>At 11:11 AM 2/11/01 -0600, Ryan Rodgers wrote:
>
> > Ok, now bricklin #2568 is the color Black, But after the painting was
> >already done, I looked at the Vin # Explained on the Bricklin web site
>and
> >according to the site #2568 was red, but the real cars color was orange,
> >could this be mistake on the web page or a mistake at the factory? Any
>one
> >have any idea?
>
>Ryan,
>
> Not the web page is correct. The "RED" actually is sort of Orange, kind
>of
>a day glow red. The "ORANGE" is really more of a pumpkin (more brown).
>
>Just another one of the Bricklin quirks.
>
>John
[This message delayed, as it was sent by someone who has their mailer set to
automatically include the entire message to which they reply. mjb.]
///
/// bricklin@autox.team.net mailing list
///
|