----- Original Message -----
From: "yugoman" <mdrig@email.msn.com>
To: "htcoating" <htcoating@sprint.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Bricklin on Autoweek
> I read somewhere that Malcolm got too cocky with AMC, and their chief said
> "Let's see you sell a car without an engine". May just be legend,
though....
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "htcoating" <htcoating@sprint.ca>
> To: <GLCurley@aol.com>
> Cc: "bricklin" <>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 4:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Bricklin on Autoweek
>
>
> > The heat they were talking about was from the catalytic converter that
> would
> > have been required for the 75 AMC motor, the 75 ford motor did not
require
> > one. Sounds like it was a possible factor but there were probably other
> more
> > important factors.
> > Rick 2028
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <GLCurley@aol.com>
> > To: <bricklin@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 3:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: Bricklin on Autoweek
> >
> >
> > > In a message dated 5/2/00 10:50:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > > brussell@powercom.net writes:
> > >
> > > > the reason to switch to the Ford engine was because
> > > > of heat concerns with the AMC.
> > >
> > > That would be really ironic if it were true, which is doubtful.
> > >
> > > George
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|