On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:53:19AM -0700, charlescox@coastalbay.com wrote:
> It states "The criterion of "adequacy" is not what the exhaust
> system consists of, but he sound level." It does not state "the criterion of
> "adequate muffler" but "the criterion of adequacy".
Yes, the criterion of adequacy...of what? The prior sentence refers
to "adequate muffler", and the title of section 3.5 is "Mufflers".
Gee, I wonder what they could be referring to!
According to your interpretation, sentence 2 directly contradicts
sentence 1. There must be a muffler. But what the system consists of
doesn't matter. But there must be a muffler. Do you really think
that the SEB meant to write a self-contradictory rule?
--
john@idsfa.net John Stimson
http://www.idsfa.net/~john/ HMC Physics '94
|