ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Lotus/Ferrari

To: Barry Spencer <bspencer@tsoft.com>,
Subject: Re: Lotus/Ferrari
From: james creasy <Black94PGT@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:28:47 -0700
barry,

i dont believe you.  when can i come over to try this and prove me wrong?
:)

-james


----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry Spencer" <bspencer@tsoft.com>
>
>
> > -------------------- Begin Original Message --------------------
> >
> > Message text written by "John J. Stimson-III"
> >
> > "The Esprit certainly is not.  However, the Elise and its variants sold
> > by Lotus can only be registered for the street by dodging around the
> > laws.  I guess that is what Scot probably meant. "
> >
> >
> > -------------------- End Original Message --------------------
> >
> > I think you're correct. But a "gray market" I'm more familar with
concerns
> > cameras purchased overseas and for which the manufacturer will not honor
> > any warranties.
> >
> > In the Elise's case, the sale is direct from the manufacturer. Their web
> > page is pretty specific that you can't drive it on the street.
> > Oh, BTW, did you see the June issue of Road & Track which ranks the
Elise
> > second only to a Ferrari as a good handling car?
> >
> > --John Kelly
>
> I wonder how much Ferrari paid  R&T????  A Ferrari is nothing better than
a
> luxury truck to drive. You need a 24Hr fitness membership to drive the
darn
> things.
> You drive a Lotus V8 Twin Turbo Esprit and then drive a Ferrari and I bet
> you'll pick the Lotus. Ferrari's are way over rated.
>
> Barry

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>