I might stay dry, but my car likes getting wet even less than I do.
And after years of riding motorcycles when I was too poor to own a car, I've
had more than my share of being miserable, cold and wet. Don't need any more
of _that_ experience, thank you very much!
I'll still make it if it's dry, but I'm not counting on that happening.
See you in the sunshine,
-----Original Message-----
From: james creasy [mailto:james@gnsbiotech.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 14:08
To: Michael R. Clements; John J. Stimson-III; Carl Merritt; Katie Kelly
Cc: Autocross
Subject: Re: new ECSTA vs old victoracer?
micheal, micheal, micheal,
even though we dont have those new fangled "roll-up windows" like those
softie production cars, we dont have to wear rain suits of oiled hide and
pig's bladder anymore. (thats what my roof is made of!)
james has a phat rain suit made from 'plastic' from a hardware store-
$14.99!! 100% waterproof.
or for the elite, GORETEX.
-james
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
To: "james creasy" <Black94PGT@pacbell.net>; "John J. Stimson-III"
<john@harlie.idsfa.net>; "Carl Merritt" <CMerritt@luminous.com>; "Katie
Kelly" <kkelly@spss.com>
Cc: "Autocross" <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:57 PM
Subject: RE: new ECSTA vs old victoracer?
> Easy to say when your car has side panels (or, dare I suggest, windows).
>
> I don't mind being cold, but I don't like to get wet unless I'm swimming!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: james creasy [mailto:Black94PGT@pacbell.net]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 13:51
> To: Michael R. Clements; John J. Stimson-III; Carl Merritt; Katie Kelly
> Cc: Autocross
> Subject: Re: new ECSTA vs old victoracer?
>
>
> > The forecasts for Sunday are jumping back and forth between "mostly
> cloudy"
> > and "rainy". What's the final word from the weather goddess?
>
> the SHOW must go ON!
>
> -james "drive your ride" creasy
> "True Street Autocross Series"
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael R. Clements" <mrclem@telocity.com>
> To: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; "Carl Merritt"
> <CMerritt@luminous.com>; "Katie Kelly" <kkelly@spss.com>
> Cc: "Autocross" <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:45 PM
> Subject: RE: new ECSTA vs old victoracer?
>
>
> > Another benefit is the ECSTAs have at least a few 18" sizes and the
V700s
> > don't have any at all.
> >
> > Hopefully, by the time I cord these G-Forces, the ECSTAs will have the
> > _correct_ 18" sizes.
> >
> > The forecasts for Sunday are jumping back and forth between "mostly
> cloudy"
> > and "rainy". What's the final word from the weather goddess?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of John J. Stimson-III
> > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 16:35
> > To: Carl Merritt
> > Cc: Bay AutoX list
> > Subject: Re: new ECSTA vs old victoracer?
> >
> >
> > > > From: Hung-Jen Hung [mailto:ospfd@yahoo.com]
> > > >
> > > > Just wondering anyone has info on new Kuhmo ECSTA? How
> > > > does it perform compare with old v700 and hoosier?
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:54:10PM -0800, Carl Merritt wrote:
> > > I can't provide any comparison data, but the new Ecsta felt very good
at
> > > Marina last weekend on my ZX. YMMV.
> >
> > Ditto on my Miata. No experience with Hoosiers or Victoracers,
> > though.
> >
> > There are only a few sizes which allow direct comparison between the
> > Victoracers and ECSTAs:
> >
> > 195/55-14
> > 205/50-15
> > 225/50-16
> > 225/45-17
> > 275/40-17
> >
> > If your car uses these sizes, you're the guinea pig!
> >
> > --
> >
> > john@idsfa.net John Stimson
> > http://www.idsfa.net/~john/ HMC Physics '94
|