In this case, anybody can take advantage of the rule (except for people with
personality or hygiene problems of course :)). So, there is no *unfair*
advantage.
--Navid
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Pat Kelly
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:32 PM
> To: Navid Kahangi; Bay_Area_Autocross_List
> Subject: Re: SFR rule
>
>
> But true in other cases?
> --Pat K
> ----------
> >From: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>
> >To: "Bay_Area_Autocross_List" <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
> >Subject: RE: SFR rule
> >Date: Thu, Nov 15, 2001, 1:22 PM
> >
>
> >Not to nitpick, but an advantage is only unfair if the others
> have no way of
> >obtaining it. Not so in this case.
> >
> >--Navid
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> >> [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of John F. Kelly Jr.
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:54 PM
> >> To: James Creasy; Jerry Mouton
> >> Cc: Bay_Area_Autocross_List
> >> Subject: Re: SFR rule
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------- Begin Original Message --------------------
> >>
> >> Message text written by James Creasy
> >>
> >> "i was even advised by a veteran autocrosser to make use of that rule-
> >> specifically to gain an advantage.
> >>
> >> -james
> >> OSP #74"
> >> -------------------- End Original Message --------------------
> >>
> >> I think you should abuse the devil out of it. Then perhaps more
> >> people will
> >> realize the rule for what it is: The Unfair Advantage.
> >>
> >> While the deal was "sold" as a benefit for new drivers, one in
> particular,
> >> the ironic twist is that both folks are gone from Bay Area
> >> autocrosses. But
> >> the rule lingers on. It's LEGAL to take unfair advantage of your fellow
> >> competitors in order to win. The rule, alas, is not fair. IMHO, It's
> >> equally unfortunate the Steering Committee declines to change it.
> >>
> >> --John Kelly
> >>
> >> --John Kelly
|