ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: SFR "Pro" class rules

To: "Andy McKee" <andrewmckee@yahoo.com>, "Jerry Mouton"
Subject: RE: SFR "Pro" class rules
From: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:25:04 -0800
Andy, that rhyme was quite dandy. You get fancy when you're antsy!

Katie

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy McKee [mailto:andrewmckee@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Kelly, Katie; Jerry Mouton; Alan Dahl; ba-autox@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: SFR "Pro" class rules


Katie,

Please don't have a coniption over my humble conception.  I realize that
your
opinion on the matter is without contention.  I shall now pause for a
moment of
reflection.

-Andy

--- "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com> wrote:
> Andy, that might be your perception, but I've seen this time
opportunity
> thing happen since its inception, whenever that was.
> 
> Katie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy McKee [mailto:andrewmckee@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:16 AM
> To: Jerry Mouton; Alan Dahl; ba-autox@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: SFR "Pro" class rules
> 
> 
> --- Jerry Mouton <jerry@moutons.org> wrote:
> >In the end it became a
> > class
> > for people who wanted to run in the morning, but their open class
was
> > in the afternoon.
> > 
> 
> People using the class for a "time opportunity" only came after the
> class
> essentially died from lack of participation.  It was probably '97 or
'98
> as the
> last year the class was really viable.  The people that populated it
> then have
> moved on to other priorities in life.  Sickos.:-)
> 
> -Andy

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>