ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: draft new supplemental regs: comments?

To: "'Patrick Jones'" <axng4me@yahoo.com>,
Subject: RE: draft new supplemental regs: comments?
From: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:31:34 -0700
Patrick Jones writes...

>> iii) Drivers must not hit the timing lights. If the
>> event is disrupted to re-align or repair the lights a
>> DNF will be assessed whether or not the timing device
>> records a time.

>Well, you can't tell a driver they must not hit the timing 
>lights.  I'm living proof that doesn't work and I didn't even 
>try.  And why is it that if I somehow manage to record a time 
>that I should be suddenly DNF'd?  I don't see the logic.  If I 
>wipe out 10 cones, cause two re-runs, and delay the event, I am >not DNF'd.
This does happen.  More regularly than timing lights >get hit.

Perhaps item iii might be better worded as:

iii) Hitting the timing lights results in an automatic DNF for that run.

Or something like that.

Katie K.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>