That's true, but it's not what you said. You said it wasn't the duty of tech.
It certainly can be, as I demonstrated. If you're trying to say that tech
can't legally bounce people for bad numbers without a supplemental regulation
in place, that's also true... and also not what you said.
Furthermore, that's the BEST place to do it, it's an equipment issue, it takes
place long enough before a car runs (normally, that's one downside to teching
on grid) for remedies to be made, and it avoids the inanity of forcing the
event chair or region chief to run around filing multiple $25 protests.
KeS
> Yes, as a provisional rule, but you should never assume a provisional rule
> will remind you of what you already need to know..to run an event legally.
>
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Kevin Stevens wrote:
>
> >
> > >I dont belive its the duty of tech to make violation calls outside of the
> > >specific safety related duties. Each driver assumes
> > >responsibility for knowledge of what is required to run the day
> > >legally.
> >
> > Not necessarily true. For example, at divisionals/tours/pros tech
> > inspection covers not only numbers but also required sponsor stickers,
> > etc.
> >
> > KeS
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Geoff Mohler <gemohler@speedtoys.com>
> California, USA
>
> I own a lotta cars. But in the best interests of not having to continualy
> edit this file to meet the needs of eight specific lists, and no to awaken
the
> idiots within others who think -thier- cars are the best and Im a fool for
> having anything -but- thier kind of car..I have not listed them. If Im on
> the list you are reading..I have one.
|