To: | Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: hp, torque, and autox |
From: | "Michael R. Clements" <mrc01@flash.net> |
Date: | Wed, 03 Jan 2001 09:54:47 -0800 |
It's admirably flat for a high RPM engine, but it does not reach the flat area until 2750 RPM. The low torque from idle to 2750 could make for difficult launches. Looking at that torque curve, I'd guess a optimal 0-60 run would require a clutch dump around 3500 RPM (just a guess, I could be wrong). It looks a lot like the water cooled V4 4-cam 748 cc engine in my Honda Magna, which has relatively flat torque from 3000 to 9000 RPM, but is weak from idle to 3000. Kit Wetzler wrote: > > > Smaller, high revving low torque engines that produce high power (like the > S2000 > or a Wankel) often have a non-flat torque curve that increases with > > increasing RPM. > > Actually, the S2000 has a relatively flat torque curve. It just remains > flat throughout the rev range, which is why it has so much horsepower > relative to it's torque. > > http://s2000.vtec.net/dyno/dyno1.html > > -kit -- Michael R. Clements mrc01@flash.net It doesn't matter who votes, it only matters who counts the votes. -- Joesph Stalin |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Huh? Was: Re: hp, torque, and autox (+Z8), Patrick Jones |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: hp, torque, and autox, Kit Wetzler |
Previous by Thread: | RE: hp, torque, and autox, Kit Wetzler |
Next by Thread: | RE: hp, torque, and autox, Kit Wetzler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |