In a message dated 2/24/2006 3:31:00 PM Eastern Standard Time,
mark@sccaprepared.com writes:
There are good reasons supporting both sides of this particular debate,
but the stuff you write above is pretty much idiocy. I don't know if its
on purpose or not, but idiocy it remains.
Mark
Mark,
I guess I didn't read Chris' post the same way you did. Maybe my
personal viewpoint on a lot of this is a result of serving several years
on the SEB and having to try to please a lot of constituencies when
making rules for the sport, but I believe Chris was trying to say that
the people who have long advocated running on street tires instead
of R-tires now have a set of their own classes in which they can run
on street tires. And yet we continue to see threads on all the lists
several times a year still advocating the elimination of R-tires.
People DO have a choice. People who want a place to run street
tires now have one. There are people who still want to run R-tires,
and they still have a place to do so. Why is co-existence of these
two groups so difficult?
GH
|