autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] Harness bar...

To: "Mark Andy" <mark@sccaprepared.com>,
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Harness bar...
From: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:38:56 -0400
If the bar precludes reinstalling the OEM belts that would also make it
illegal for stock class.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Andy" <mark@sccaprepared.com>
To: "James Rogerson" <jrogerson@Houston.rr.com>
Cc: "Keath Marx" <larrybulk@marx.ws>; <autox@autox.team.net>;
<evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Harness bar...


> Howdy,
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, James Rogerson wrote:
> > Nope:
> >
> > The Hardbar harness bar ties into the "B" pillar of the vehicle with
Grade
> > 12.9 socket head cap screws using the OEM shoulder harness mounting
> > locations. This bar has an additional benefit in that it stiffens the
> > chassis of the vehicle in torsion.
> >
> > Even though they say it is Solo II legal later on in the ad, the part in
> > bold above is in excess of the rules.  (no other purpose)
>
> I'd have sworn I saw a clarification saying this was actually legal
> somewhere...  Are you sure?  As I recall, the interpretation changed in
> the last few years.
>
> Mark






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>