autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: shop manuals

To: James Gunn-Wilkinson <jgunn@genoptix.com>, Smokerbros@aol.com,
Subject: Re: shop manuals
From: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:16:24 -0500
I'm sure SCCA won't mind fronting the bill for that.  :^)

So Charlie, with those particulars how do you feel about it now?
Mr. Sirota or Mr. Hollis?

Matt Murray


----- Original Message ----- 
> The tool you need to access all of the OBDII functions on
Porsches (and
> I would guess most of the German companies are doing something
similar)
> is their proprietary Tec II system tester.  I believe it goes
for
> $10,000 plus quarterly maintenance fees (for software updates)
of ~$400.
>
> Since the OBDII book is virtually useless without it (you can
only
> access smog realted OBDII codes without it), would you also
need the
> Tech2?
>
>
> James Gunn-Wilkinson
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Thanks, I appreciate the view point. But if the OBD2 is not
part of the
> normal service manual collection, wouldn't responsibility fall
back on
> the protestor (not the protestee)?
>
> Matt Murray
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Smokerbros@aol.com>
>
> > In a message dated 3/1/04 10:47:43 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> > mattm@optonline.net writes:
> >
> >
> > > A question for those who have been on a protest committee
or
> SEB or
> > > advisory classing committee. Is the OBD2 supplement
> mandatory? It is a
> > >
> >
> > Depends on what is being protested.  If someone is protesting
> suspension
> > components in a Stock class, as a PC member I wouldn't dsq a
> competitor for not
> > providing the OBD II supplement.  In SP or Prepared, the OBD
II
> supplement isn't
> > needed, as OBD II isn't required in those classes.  But get
> protested on OBD
> > II operation in a Stock class, fail to provide any info on
the
> OBD II system
> > and I think the PC would have to discuss whether DSQ is
> appropriate.
> >
> > My opinion, only...
> >
> > Charlie






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>