On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Rick Cone wrote:
> Thinking about this 1/4" thing...
>
> Everyone here knows the difficulty and problems with the proposed 1/4" rule.
>
> But do you think the SEB set the number right at the threshold of absurdity
> to cause a big uproar, to keep it the way it is.... '.25" are you kidding,
> I'd rather have it the way it is now...'
>
> It seems they have thrown out a choice, 1/4" or we can leave it the way it
> is....
>
> What we need are realistic tolerances... like 1/2" or 5/8", and perhaps even
> phased in starting at 3/4"
>
> Rick Cone
How about 10mm? ;)
KeS
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|