autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stock Shock Rules rewrite? Part 3

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Stock Shock Rules rewrite? Part 3
From: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 23:34:54 EST
Byron writes


> What about older stock cars that no longer have oem shocks
> available?  Shocks would be handled like any other parts
> which are no longer available from the manufacturer--there
> is specific wording in the rule book which allows the next
> closest thing that can be found in the aftermarket that is
> as near as possible to a direct replacement and not "high
> performance" in nature.  It works for all sorts of other
> 

Uh, that rule is in SP, not Stock.  The only wording that might be used is on 
Pg. 89 of the '01 rule book, in the opening section of Section 13.  It allows 
"normally expendable components" to be replaced with alternate components 
which are the same type and size and used in the same location.  And how 
would you interpret THAT with respect to shocks?

Charlie

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>