DG wrote in part:
>>
...But yes, you guys are on thin ice. There's nothing wrong with y'all
making
hay while the sun shines and having fun while it lasts, but your foundation
is built on sand.<<
Dennis,
You've been very helpful in developing SM and SM2. I, for one, appreciate
your efforts and arguments for these classes. But why is it that only the
classes you have "invented" or "co-invented" are ok in your book. Must you
rewrite the entire class structure in your own image? (note clever allusion
to Dennis' god-like tendencies)
There is NOTHING wrong with STS NOW. If in the future tire manufacturers
start playing then the SEB will do something. Until then let the STS guys
alone!!!
Regards,
Alan
/// autox@autox.team.net mailing list
///
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe autox
///
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
|