To: | Bhaden@ucsd.edu, Jeff@cyberconceptz.com, jemitchell@compuserve.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: SM Legal Polouters |
From: | "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:59:13 -0800 |
>It's also against Federal law to replace a properly functioning cat. >You are NOT allowed to replace a cat unless it is defective. Oh, THAT one isn't a problem. Whack the original with a rubber mallet a few times (not illegal). Now it's defective. Replace. I actually had a problem with a '94 ESP Camaro - the original cat blew out, and the dealer initially refused to replace it under the EPA warranty, because the car still (barely) passed smog. KeS _________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', Kevin Stevens |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: SM Legal Polluters, Kevin Stevens |
Previous by Thread: | RE: SM Legal Polouters, Paul Foster |
Next by Thread: | Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', SVPViper |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |