Dave Schotz wrote:
>Here is the problem... Street Mod rules clearly state (and I
quote)
>
> "C. Street Modified
> The purpose of this class is to allow the maximum amount of
creativity while maintaining streetability. The following
modifications are allowed beyond those allowed for STR
> 1.
> a) All Street Prepared modifications allowed"
I understand perfectly well the stated purpose of the rules, even
though it has apparently escaped the writers of the rules that
the stated intent is impossible to achieve. SP allowances are
inconsistent with the stated philosophy of "steet driven" cars,
however, since it's not legal to drive a car with defeated
emission controls on the street anywhere in this country.
> b) Vehicle must be legally registered for the street
> This has been interpreted as Having License plates, and
registration. For the vehicle.
I understand this as well. It results in an absolutely
self-contradictory rule set, however. If I want to build an SM
car that complies with the _spirit_ of the original concept, AND
if I happen to believe that my street car should comply with the
law as well as be environmentally firendly (I do believe those
things, BTW), the SM playing field is suddenly nowhere near
level. I'm at a major disadvantage to someone who is willing to
register an illegal car on the street. Is that fair? ;<)
> At least, last time I checked... The Difference between Street
Prepared, and Street Mod... is you could still do all the intake
& exhaust mods in SP, but you wouldn't have to have the car
licensed.
Hell, you don't have to have a Stock car licensed or registered.
The "street licensed" part of the SM rules is what makes no
sense. IMHO, you should write _vehicle_prep_ rules, leave out
PR-motivated stuff like street licensing, and let the competitors
make their own ethical decisions.
Jay
|