autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Street Mod exclusions

To: <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Street Mod exclusions
From: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:59:11 -0500
Who said anything about building? 
http://www.968.net/racing/bruces_turbo_rs.htm
Think this would pass muster? :^) It resides in Massachusetts.

Matt Murray

mattm@optonline.net

For the ultimate Rally book and information, 
go to http://www.goss.com/rally.htm
and type in "MU01" for a ten percent discount.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
To: <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: Street Mod exclusions, was: What's wrong with this picture?


> The downside to letting potential overdogs in and then
> booting them if they're too fast is the investment that
> booted competitor made is largely wasted. Imagine if
> someone builds a turbocharged 968 Club Sport for big
> $$$ and gets to run one season in SM and then gets
> booted for being an overdog.   Better to take care of
> that kind of thing up front if possible. It's
> definitely a balancing act.   I'd like to see the
> 944/968s, 928s, and 300ZXs included. I think it will
> happen eventually.
> 
> Kent Rafferty
> 
> > I'd agree with the 944 T being a possible overdog,
> but then so is a M3 with
> > a charger or the others you mentioned. I think that
> the P-cars should be
> > allowed and then see if it would overpower. I think
> it would be an
> > appropriate match for your car, and 300 ZX, etc.
> Restricting a car because
> > "one" thinks that it will be fast, isn't giving due
> diligence.
> >
> > Matt Murray
> >
> > mattm@optonline.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>