autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rubber Rules for STD

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Rubber Rules for STD
From: "John A. Carriere" <jacircts@mich.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 09:49:04 -0400
It's those raised white letters that cause me concern :-O

Jay so sagely stated:
> OK, you heard it here first. Roger is proposing yet another
> "alphabet soup" class, STD. This time, let's all learn from past
> mistakes and get the rubber issue out of the way in advance. The
> way I see it, we have the following options:
> 
> 1. "True street rubber." Also known as "raincoats." Known for
> durability more than for grip or feel, this might be the least
> expensive approach. There is also the possibility for some
> interesting "tread designs." But how would we prevent mfrs. from
> making "ringers" that have more grip and sensitivity?
> 
> 2. "Street-legal" rubber. While they carry the CDC "approval," we
> all know that they cost a lot more and just don't last as long as
> the "real street" variety. Upside is higher grip and better feel,
> which can make for a quicker performance.
> 
> 3. Slicks. Sky's-the-limit, no-holds-barred rubber. Grip is
> astonishing, feel is second to none, useful life is shortest.
> These will yield the fastest times, but we'll then have to
> decided if we want to allow cantilevered versions, which would
> make fitting critical.
> 
> 
> Lessee a show of hands on this one. No, that's not what I meant.
> I meant, insert your opinion here.


JACircuits Autocross Timing Systems 
    http://www.mich.com/~jacircts
- Timing the SCCA Solo II Nationals since 1985
                                ***********

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>