autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] Letter to the SEB: H-Stock changes

To: "Team.Net" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Letter to the SEB: H-Stock changes
From: William Loring <bloring@tirerack.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:28:00 -0800
I understand the logic, I still respectfully disagree with the proposed
action. HS is the class of last resort. There are a zillion cars in HS, but
nearly all of them are _completely_ uncompetitive in the class. What's the
point of classing them at all, if they've got no chance whatsoever? I
realize that we can't make _all_ the cars competitive, but I think we can do
better than we are.

I also sympathize with Scott Hearne. I was so unaware of the transition of
the 89-91 Civic Si to HS, that I actually ran our first SBR points event in
ES, then someone told me afterwards that my car had been moved to HS!!

So Scott, who's CSP Honda did you buy?

Regards,

William Loring


> From: "Hollis, Andy" <ahollis@origin.ea.com>
> Subject: RE: [evolution-disc.] Letter to the SEB: H-Stock changes
> 
> One thing to remember in this discussion is that the reason for the cars
> coming to HS is because there is a class being added up high.  So the new HS
> is not supposed to be the same as the old one.  The proposal reflects a new
> HS composed of the old one plus some of the slwoer ES cars.  The faster ES
> cars go to the new GS.  Try and think in terms of the whole proposal to
> understand the logic behind it.
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [evolution-disc.] Letter to the SEB: H-Stock changes, William Loring <=