autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Backspacing vs. Offset

To: Dick Rasmussen <rasmussend@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Backspacing vs. Offset
From: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 20:33:41 -0500
Thanks, Dick!  

That cleared it up perfectly. The example that you've provided from
Revolution clearly shows that positive offset actually means moving
the mounting surface out from the center of the rim, which then means
moving the tire closer to the car.  That's just the opposite of what I
was thinking.

Guess it's time for some of us Old Fartz to learn the political
correctness here!!!  8<{)

John (Old Fartz & TLS #37) Lieberman


Dick Rasmussen wrote:
> 
> It appears that there are two different "signing conventions" for positive
> vs. negative offset.
> 
> Here is one of them:  http://www.ttrsracing.com/fitmet_diagram.htm
> 
> which, as shown in this table, for this signing convention,
> http://www.ttrsracing.com/revo4spoke.htm
> 
> means positive offset results in more backside spacing. Look specifically
> at the 5.5" X 13 wheels since they have versions for both positive and
> negative offset.
> 
> However, I'm pretty sure I've seen the opposite.
> 
> Dick Rasmussen
> CM 85
> 85 Van Diemen RF-85 Formula Ford

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>