autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: (Long) Comments on Nationals/M3/ESP (skip to end for ESP conc

To: "'Kent Rafferty'" <gs96@sgi.net>, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: (Long) Comments on Nationals/M3/ESP (skip to end for ESP conc
From: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 12:49:27 -0700
        Yes we know Kent can drive slow. He was pulling a Tunnel/Ames in the
Pro, just go fast enough to win, but slow enough that he got a head start on
me in the challenge with an SS index. ;> 

Jason "RX7 KLR" Isley
jason.isley@alltel.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Kent Rafferty [mailto:gs96@sgi.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 12:40 PM
To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: (Long) Comments on Nationals/M3/ESP (skip to end for ESP
conclusions)


I can suggest what NOT to do.  If I try to drive
conservative-and-clean, it typically turns out to be
clean-and-dog slow and the run is wasted anyway.  On
the North course, I ran conservatively, but I though
respectably, on my first run.  I was just flat-out
slow.  My second run, when I drove angry :-), was 2.6
seconds faster than my first run.  I'm going to tape
the first run timeslip to my dashboard to remind me
that if I'm in total control of the car on course and
confident I'm not going to hit any cones, I'm driving
WAY too slow.....

Kent Rafferty

Randy wrote:
> What is the best strategy, or does it become
>determined by your competition and what happens? You
>always have to go fast, but do you make sure you first
>get a clean run in and then push it on your 2nd and
3rd
>runs? That seems to make sense.







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: (Long) Comments on Nationals/M3/ESP (skip to end for ESP conc, Isley, Jason C. <=