autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Lightweight wheels...drive only?

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Lightweight wheels...drive only?
From: "Otto Crosser" <ottocrosser@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:02:38 EDT
Well, If you take wheelspin into account, it will be more benificial to put 
the lightweight wheels on the DRIVE wheels to get MORE wheelspin.  WOOHOO 
Burnouts are cool!

                     OTTO


>From: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com
>Reply-To: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com
>To: autox@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: Lightweight wheels...drive only?
>Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:13:02 -0400
>
>Per (GRMPer@aol.com) wrote:
>
> > Anybody out there know if you just replace the DRIVE wheels with lighter
> > pieces, how much advantage this is?
>
> > Are the drive wheels 50% of the rotational inertia from the wheels...or
>is it
> > more?
>
>Imagine you have a tank - you know, big-ass metal thing with a big gun -
>and you turn it upside-down so the track is in the air. Drive wheels are in
>the back, all the bogies are just along for the ride.
>
>Run the engine, watch all the wheels turn, driven by the track - so each
>wheel is causing an inertia penalty.
>
>Now separate the track (one long strip, instead of a continuous loop) and
>lay it across the wheels. Run the engine. Watch all the wheels turn until
>you run out of track and it falls off.
>
>Now consider that the "ground" is really a drive belt of infinate length,
>and as long as the non-drive wheels of your car are in contact with the
>ground, the drive wheels are driving the non-drive wheels, just like the
>upside-down tank.
>
>So, assuming similar wheel size front and rear, and assuming 2 drive
>wheels, the drive wheels make up 50% of the rotating inertia from the
>wheels. QED.
>
>Funny tank story: A tank is really a locomotive, where the "rails" are
>continuously picked up after they've been driven over and placed up front
>again. Of all the wheels on a tank, only the drive sprocket (one per side)
>is actually connected to anything - like brakes. I once saw a crew, who had
>to replace some track sections and thought they could cut corners, break
>both sides of the track (explicitly forbidden!) and as soon as the track
>was free of both drive sprockets, 45 tonnes of tank rolled down the
>now-flat track sections like a big ol' roller coaster, down a hill, and
>into a swamp. Doh!
>
>DG
>

________________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>