> Behalf Of Ghsharp@aol.com
> elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org writes:
>
> > That's exactly why I originally referred to the non-allowance of
> > aftermarket suspension busings in STS as an oversight. In an otherwise
> > "bolt-on" class, why wouldn't one allow aftermarket suspension bushings?
> Ghsharp@aol.com replied:
> There was a fair amount of member/competitor input when these
> rules were formulated, and we haven't seen a groundswell of interest in
> changing them in this area so far. But if you'd like to suggest a change,
> you can write a letter or send an e-mail through the SCCA website.
>
Wow! This does appear to be an oversight. I just assumed it was legal given
the nature of the class. I hadn't checked because I hadn't planned on doing
it myself. But I know several local ST competitors that have. I'm not going
to protest them because it seems so natural for the class.
I'll get that letter off today.
On a somewhat related note: Peter Egan's column in Road & Track this month
is a really excellent editorial against those who cheat in racing. Well
worth the read (unless you cheat, then you might be offended.)
Eric Buckley
7 STR: 98 Integra GS/R
|