autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: More on Sequential classes

To: "Alan Dahl" <adahl@eskimo.com>, <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: More on Sequential classes
From: "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 12:00:11 -0400
but don't these "fast" gals run in their respective open classes anyway?

Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-autox@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of Alan Dahl
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 11:48 AM
To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: More on Sequential classes


At 12:56 PM 7/7/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Now, sort the Stock preparation cars into the 10 bottom classes. Then
>adjust upwards or downwards for cars that are prepared to ST, SM or SP
>allowances. Heck, we could even throw the Ladies classes into this mix by
>dropping them down a class if they want to declare as Ladies competitors
>(the only flaw in that idea is that the lowest class car declared into
>Ladies wouldn't have a class to run in unless we added a 15th ladies only
>class).

No, the flaw is that Shauna Marinus, Teresa Niedel, Lynn Rothney-Kozlak,
Kay Bailey or any of the many, many fast ladies out there would just kick
the rears of all of the guys in the lower class. Trust me, I have ran
against and been beat by many of these ladies in the past straight-up. Give
them a competitive advantage, especially one as great as a class-level one,
and they would eat us all for lunch.

- Alan Dahl



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>