| To: | "team.net" <autox@autox.team.net> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Sequential Stock Classes | 
| From: | "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net> | 
| Date: | Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:37:09 -0400 | 
<<<Perhaps a better approach would be to abandon SC,BoB in favor of straight AX potential. Class 1 is for your fastest cars, Class 9 for slowest. >>> <<<My reply: Hear, hear for this proposal!!! Brilliantly simple and easy to sort cars. I LIKE IT. Kinda takes the politics and sponsorship potential inequities out of it, too. Let's do it. But, methinks, some will hate the simplicity of it.>>> Check the archives. I made the same suggestion years ago. :) Paul Foster  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: front sway bar allowance, Linnhoff, Eric | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ProSolo questions, Don Miller | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Sequential Stock Classes, TeamZ3 | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Sequential Stock Classes, Ghsharp | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |