To: | "team.net" <autox@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Sequential Stock Classes |
From: | "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net> |
Date: | Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:37:09 -0400 |
<<<Perhaps a better approach would be to abandon SC,BoB in favor of straight AX potential. Class 1 is for your fastest cars, Class 9 for slowest. >>> <<<My reply: Hear, hear for this proposal!!! Brilliantly simple and easy to sort cars. I LIKE IT. Kinda takes the politics and sponsorship potential inequities out of it, too. Let's do it. But, methinks, some will hate the simplicity of it.>>> Check the archives. I made the same suggestion years ago. :) Paul Foster |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: front sway bar allowance, Linnhoff, Eric |
---|---|
Next by Date: | ProSolo questions, Don Miller |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Sequential Stock Classes, TeamZ3 |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sequential Stock Classes, Ghsharp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |