OK, so building an older Civic Hatchback up with an engine swap and a
Super/Turbocharger and it wont become "the car to have"?!?
----- Original Message -----
From: <reddog_es22@juno.com>
To: <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Cc: <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: new to list
> Picture this... Heath McMillan's CRX with a SUPERCHARGER! That would be a
> really tough combination to beat. One of the major premises of SM (the
> way I've always seen it) is that there are many different cars that can
> be competitive. Throw in a car that light with a lot of horsepower and it
> will become the "car to have." Just my opinion, YMMV.
>
> Scott Sawyer, HS 22
> Team Underdog Racing, Underdog F&C
> SCCA
> http://www.teamunderdog.com
>
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:38:43 -0400 "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
> writes:
> > It does sound like a really silly rule..
> >
> > "lets allow almost unlimited mods as long as you have somthing
> > resembling a
> > rear seat, ummm I mean HAD a rear seat because you are allowed to
> > remove
> > them, I mean except porsche cars, they might be faster then a well
> > prepaired
> > eclipse, and they have a back seat, oh no not ANY porsches not even
> > the
> > sedate 924's that's right they are MUCH sportier then a supra or
> > eclipse..
> > Oh yea and we will allow RX7 2+2 but only if they don't upset the
> > class.."
> >
> > ummm ok.. Yuck Yuck, Now where is the turnup truck I just fell off
> > of?
> >
> > want to explain the logic behind that? please!
> > I understand the rule just not why...
> >
> >
> > PS. I love the rest of SM just not the silly exclusions..
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>
|