autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Solo participation too high?

To: tcbracer@juno.com, coxb@trimofran.org
Subject: Re: Solo participation too high?
From: "John Gross" <jogross3@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:59:29 PDT
>Some of us are becoming active in administration, course design, 
> >promotion, etc.

Agreed.  I was the SOLO II co-chairman of my club 1 year after finding out 
about SOLO II.  Admittedly, we're a club of college students, but that means 
that in order for us to stick around, our members have to get seriously 
involved quickly, which they do.  We typically have no shortage of 
volunteers to help with course setup and teardown, we have more people 
wanting to design courses than we do events, etc, etc, etc.  I honestly 
don't know how many people are in our club (I would estimate approx. 150-200 
paid members) and we typically get about 15-20 new members every year.  Not 
all of them autocross, but a number of them do.  We hold a autocross 
driver's ed course at the start of every semester, and for the past few 
semesters, we had 80+ people at each one, most of them new and hooked on the 
sport!  The low cost is one very seriously attractive feature to SOLO II 
racing.  Someone mentioned ealier that one solution might be to add more 
events to the schedule.  I know the schedule is already pretty busy, but if 
you add more events, I'd bet you'd still get large turnouts (though they'd 
likely be a more manageable size) and have more events = more driving = more 
smack talk = more fun!  That's what this thing's all about!
________________________________________________________________________


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>