autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cone Mulligans

To: Rocky Entriken <rocky@tri.net>
Subject: Re: Cone Mulligans
From: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:49:43 -0600
Yep!  More good suggestions.  You could also limit the total number of
mulligans that any one person could buy for the entire day and the
total number that could be used on any single run to, say, two?!?  Or,
after you set out all your other restrictions, tell everybody that
they'll only be allowed to use their mulligans on one run.  And that
run won't be determined until the event is over by drawing numbers out
of a hat.  Anybody else?  Are you making a list, John M?  8<{)

John (Old Fartz & TLS #37) Lieberman


Rocky Entriken wrote:
> 
> How about ruling that no two consecutive cones on the same side of the car,
> and no two out of three consecutive slalom cones, can be bought as
> mulligans?
> 
> Then if you really want to prevent a mulligan at a specific danger zone,
> double-cone the apex and/or exit. (They get to claim one as mulligan, must
> take the penalty for the other whether a cone-hit or off-course). Make your
> slaloms at least 4 cones and they MUST weave at least two of them.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>