"Mark J. Andy" wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Engstrom wrote:
> > Uhhh, John, in addition to being Red River Region RE and Vice President
> > of the Shreveport Journalism Foundation, you're also the Southwest Division
> > Solo Safety Steward. How would you prevent me from buying 5 "cone
> > mulligans" and barreling through a three cone slalom and two offset cones
> > and entering a sharp turn at 90+ MPH? Maybe you could set a limit to the
> > number of "cone mulligans" bought, but the safety steward would have to
> > assess the course beforehand to find a safe limit on the number of cones.
> > Seems like kind of a problem to me.
>
> Just make a rule that you can't use con mulligans on multiple cones in a
> row. Like, knock over one cone is fine, but three in a row isn't. Three
> individual cones are fine, etc.
Would those mulligan points count towards DNF cones? Cutting off a
particular apex cone might prove excessively beneficial.
> That would make the SSS job easier 'cause they'd just have to make sure
> that a deliberate killing of one cone didn't create problems.
Agreed. Unless the cone's name happens to be "Kenny". :-)
-Josh2
--
Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR
'87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro
jhadler@rmi.net
http://rainbow.rmi.net/~jhadler/
|