JIsley@cell1.com writes:
<< Ok, I will amend all future post to say "excluding AS so we don't mess up
Mr. Sipe's happy little echo system". lol >>
What am I, a dolphin or something?
It's not about A Stock or Mr. Sipe's personal salvation.
It concerns me that the proposal for Stock class rule changes seems to ever
be on the increase, usually by some Mr/Ms Johnny-Come-Lately. Despite the
continuous Team.net criticism of the SEB, my detailed conversations with the
various committee members (you really should try it sometime) has
demonstrated to me that they have a much greater appreciation for, and
understanding of, the *entire* scope and impact of changes, much more so than
Mr/Ms JCL can even begin to comprehend. There's a reason that the SEB is
composed of members of long standing experience, just as there's a reason
they don't cotton to the "rule change of the week" syndrone. The class rules
are the foundation, and if the foundation isn't stable the whole thing can
come crashing down.
Since you're making it personal, let's get back to me. I could care less if
swaybar rule changes one way or the other; I only want rules stability. I
will still do everything within the rules to setup and tune the car to it's
max potential. If you think changing the swaybar rule will somehow equalize
the competition or provide you personally with a more level playing field
then you're kidding yourself. You still have to drive the car to it's
potential and a certain group of people will still have the latest & greatest
equipment, the most technical knowledge, the best training, the most seat
time, etc.
Frankly, it all just sounds to me like a bunch of losers sqawking out excuses
as to why they can't win. Hell, it'd be worth it to go back to pure stock,
and I mean in every detail including replaceable wear parts, just to see who
eats crow.
M Sipe
- fixated on winning, not making excuses
|