autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Spokes: Re: Big Swaybar Woes...

To: Ghsharp@aol.com
Subject: Re: Spokes: Re: Big Swaybar Woes...
From: Bob Klingler <bklingler@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 07:42:01 -0600
Ghsharp@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 8/24/99 8:29:20 PM EST, bklingler@worldnet.att.net writes:
> 
> > Regardless of what name we give the sway bar mounts, we all realize they
> > will need replacement.  Would you also argue that each time these
> > separate sheet metal parts are replaced with factory replacement parts,
> > they also have to be tack welded?  My presumption is that Mazda used the
> > tack welds for production purposes, and then bolted the mount in place
> > for strength.
> >
> > As you probably both know from experience, if the tack welded part
> > breaks at an event, cutting that tack weld can be a genuine pain, and
> > re-tacking is structurally unnecessary.  Those replacement parts are
> > provided without replacement instructions, and it is not obvious that
> > welding was even intended.  (Holes are not provided.)
> 
> Bob,
> 
> What does the factory workshop manual say about removing and installing
> those brackets?  If your supposition is correct about the tack welds being
> only for production purposes, the workshop manual should tell you not to
> re-weld a replacement bracket.  OTOH, if the factory manual says to re-weld
> them, they must be re-welded.

I have both the 99 Workshop Manuel and the Service Highlights. 
Unfortunately neither addresses replacement or repair of the brackets,
so no help here. 

> 
> > Finally, would it be legal to just weld up the cracks, as long as there
> > is no intention of improving the strength?  Obviously the annealed area
> > will be at a strength deficit.
> 
> I wouldn't have a problem with it, but that's just my own personal opinion,
> not necessarily that of the rest of the SEB.

Understand, and thanks for the vote.

BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>