autox
[Top] [All Lists]

points for classing was: goofy canadian rules

To: eric10mm@qni.com, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: points for classing was: goofy canadian rules
From: "Jeff Lloyd" <jslz3@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 17:25:18 GMT
Listers,

I don't know about you but I fully believe a points system can work and will 
allow equalizing of many cars between classes, for example, a neon starts 
off in class D  or D Stock  and the owner adds a updated coil over system 
this costs him 25 points moving him up a class to compete with stock MR2's, 
and even better you can equalize cars out by making them High or low in the 
points scale, say for example, OK a Miata and A Z3 1.9 are in the same 
class, I agree with that. but in our current class structure the Z3 will 
never be competitive (a harsh reality I live with every weekend) but in this 
*NEW* class structure, The Z3 has a chance, it is classed in the same 
bracket, but 15 points less, so the owner can add camber plates, for 5 
points, and replacement springs for 10 points, and he is now = in points to 
the miata, and equal in potential performance, or if he chooses to he can 
add more changes and move up to the next class, so there is no more, Oh I'm 
in SP now so I need to do EVERYTHING to be competitive... there will be a 
constant progression up the ranks, and a totally worked car can make it to 
mod where say a FF starts out.

I have given this many nights of thought and I believe it can and will work, 
much better then the expensive, archaic system we currently have in place. 
and it is MUCH more street friendly

Jeff Lloyd


>From: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
>Howdy everybody!!!
>
>Has anyone ever taken the time to compare the CACC (Canadian version of
>SCCA) and the SCCA Solo rules?
>
>The reason I ask is that last night someone posted some results from a
>Canadian/American race and there was a link to the rules for their Stock 
>and
>Super Stock (Canadian version of SP) rules.
>
>I kinda like their more real world realistic points system of allowed
>modifications for the two "lower" classes.  Gee I wish I could remember 
>that
>URL right about now.
>
>Any thoughts?  How did they come to have this variation of our rules?  Are
>there any down sides to their points system?  And please don't give me that
>same old tired argument of "it'll just make one more thing that newcomers
>MUST buy to be competitive".  That dog just won't hunt.
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>See you on course.
>
>Eric Linnhoff in KC
>#69 DS  TLS #13
>eric10mm@qni.com
>
>"Dolphin Safe Tuna".
>It's okay, unless you happen to be the Tuna.
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>