Thanx for the reminder Richard
Judy {:>}
At 02:35 PM 6/18/99 -0700, richard nichols wrote:
>Judy, I believe he meant "looser" the way it was spelled, not the way you
>took it (loser)! :]
>
>"Looser", as in "less tight". Certainly that's how it looks contextually.
>
>Richard Nichols
>rnichol1@san.rr.com
>
>Judy said:
>>I wouldn't say that drivers finding a place to both competitively run &
>>enjoy yourself would qualify as being in a consistent loser class.
>
>>At 01:16 PM 6/18/99 -0500, Bill Fuhrmann wrote:
>
>
>>>Wasn't the push for ST based on the idea of a set of consistent "looser"
>local rules to let people bring their street cars out to play and have fun?
>
>
>
>
|