| To: | "'Paul Foster'" <pfoster@gdi.net>, | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Neon ACR and the SCCA | 
| From: | Phil Osborne <posborne@minuteman-ups.com> | 
| Date: | Wed, 9 Jun 1999 14:07:09 -0500 | 
So, where would YOU have classed it Paul? The original single cam ACR's were in E Stock, where they were all beaten that year at Nationals. The SCCA, very wisely I might add, booted both versions to D Stock the following year along with the E Stock winner's marque...What's next, Super Stock?.... Phil O. That sure sounds like semantics to me. Aut the _key_ is placing it in the right class where it doesn't _dominate_. Paul Foster  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: a question of semantics and inelegance phrasing (mine), richard nichols | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Contingency/apocalypse info, Mike Bultemeier | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA, Paul Foster | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA, Paul Foster | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |