autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (Very Long, but informative)

To: <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (Very Long, but informative)
From: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:26:37 -0600
Paul Weber typed:

>I kept telling myself I wouldn't get involved in this discussion
but the level
>of misinformation has pushed me over the edge.


Thank you, thank you. I knew somebody with direct experience in
this field would be on the list.

<snip long, very informative post>

>If you are passing an IM-240 type test with a vehicle that does
not have
>catalysts, it is probably a pre-91 or pre-86 vehicle (these
years were steps in
>emission regulations), or the operators do not know how to
run/calibrate their
>equipment properly.

I was certain this was true, but I didn't have sufficient
specifics to make that assertion. Thanks again. Are you guys
listenin' oth there?

Wanna buy a Fish Carburetor? I know a guy who's got some
squirreled away. Lemme know....

Jay




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>