autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Ford Miata?

To: "team.net" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Ford Miata?
From: "Geza Korchmaros" <yoshi@adni.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:44:56 -0500
He is wrong, you are right.  The Miata is a unique car designed from the
ground up as a Light Weight Sports Car.  He must be thinking about the Capri
which was a Ford of Australia project based on the Mazda 323.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-autox@autox.team.net]On
> Behalf Of Steve Couture
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 1999 3:10 PM
> To: Team.Net
> Subject: Ford Miata?
>
>
> I was just reading the April 99 (oops 1999, must by Y2K compilant!)
> issue of PC World.  In the Up Front column on page 19, Phil Lemmons
> (editorial director of PC World) writes:
>
> "The iMac and G3 are in some ways like the Mazda Miata.  The Miata
> shares inner components with a much less successful Ford model, but a
> designer exterior made the Miata a sensation.  Few can name the Ford
> equivalent."
>
> He then goes on to discuss the similarities between the new Apple
> iMac/G3 and a standard PC from an internal architecture perspective.
>
> But this car analogy has me stumped.  I thought the Miata was a unique
> Mazda creation.  What Ford model is this guy talking about?  Is there
> a Ford model that shares significant componentry with the Miata?  Is
> this guy thinking about the Mazda Mx-6 / Ford Probe relationship and
> just got the model wrong?  (If that's the case I certainly wouldn't
> call the Mx-6 a "sensation". :)  Or is he thinking that the Capri and
> Miata are somehow related?  Are they?  (I thought the Capri was front
> wheel drive.)
>
> Or am I correct in thinking that the writer here really doesn't know
> much about cars and is just using an analogy to add color to his
> geek-speak and since computer nerds aren't supposed to know anything
> about cars we won't catch on that he completely made this up?
>
> --
> Steve Couture (rhymes with future)
> Techno-geek and Neon driver (is that redundant?)
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>